המוקד להגנת הפרט
عر HE wheel chair icon
Damage to Property
Damage to PropertyConfiscation of PropertyTheftHouse DemolitionsSeizure of HousesDamage to Infrastructure
Updates
israeli law
international law
literature
all documents
Sort by: Newest
Newest
Oldest
results in page: 10
10
20
30
40
50
By date range
By date range
17.08.2017
Following HaMoked’s petition against the military’s intention to complete a punitive demolition of a West Bank residential unit demolished a year earlier: the remaining parts of the targeted floor will be sealed rather than demolished, to prevent damage to the ground floor where the family lives
16.08.2017
Wrongfully and without proper notice: the military demolished tonight a family home in the West Bank, without bothering to respond to HaMoked’s objection in the matter
03.08.2017
The HCJ approves the punitive demolition of four homes in the West Bank: one home will be demolished completely; in three other homes only the top floor will be demolished, given the absence of a “residential link” between the assailants and the ground floors
31.07.2017
HaMoked to the HCJ: direct the military not to resume enforcing a partially-implemented punitive demolition order
24.07.2017
HaMoked petitioned the HCJ against the intended punitive demolition of four homes in the West Bank: the court issued a temporary injunction prohibiting the demolitions until further decision
23.07.2017
The military rejected the objections to the planned punitive demolitions of four West Bank homes: HaMoked is about to petition the HCJ
23.07.2017
Updated summary on punitive home demolitions from July 2014 to July 23, 2017
16.07.2017
The military intends to punitively demolish another family home in the West Bank: HaMoked files an objection against the order
09.07.2017
HaMoked to the military: abandon your intention to punitively demolish three homes in the West Bank
05.07.2017
The HCJ rejects a petition to demolish the family homes of Israeli Jewish assailants: “Given the difficulties arising from exercising the authority under Regulation 119… it seems it would be wrong to extend it to other attribution groups regarding whom even the state considers it unnecessary at this stage”