Center for the Defence of the Individual - The state objects to a principled discussion on the issue of punitive demolition before an expanded panel: critical comments by justices do not warrant revisiting “the entrenched and consistent rule in the case law of this honorable court”

Choose Themes

Damage to Property

Deportation

Detention

Detention Without Trial

East Jerusalem

Freedom of Movement

House Demolitions

Human Rights Defenders

Legal - General

Reparations

Residency in the OPT

Respect for the Dead

Rights of Detainees

Secret Prison Facility 1391

Separation Wall

Torture

Violence

Add Reset selection

Choose document type

Add Reset selection

to

The state objects to a principled discussion on the issue of punitive demolition before an expanded panel: critical comments by justices do not warrant revisiting “the entrenched and consistent rule in the case law of this honorable court”