המוקד להגנת הפרט
عر HE wheel chair icon
Injury
Updates
israeli law
international law
literature
all documents
Sort by: Newest
Newest
Oldest
results in page: 10
10
20
30
40
50
By date range
By date range
22.09.2009
Six years after the court ruled in a civil suit against Avri Ran for the assault of a handicapped Palestinian youth, the plaintiff finally received the entire compensation: Ran made payment on the compensation only after two warrants for his incarceration were issued in the framework of an execution office case brought against him by HaMoked. His conduct throughout the various proceedings reflects a man who perceives himself above the law
02.08.2009
Human rights organizations in Israel, including HaMoked, appeal to the government: Do not silence "Breaking Silence"
01.07.2009
HCJ 7195/08 - Abu Rahme et al. v. Brigadier General Avichai Mandelblit, Military Advocate General Judgment
25.02.2009
The Law Applicable to Non-Occupied Gaza: A Comment on Bassiouni v. Prime Minster of Israel
21.01.2009
Investigation into the Army's use of Phosphorus Shells in Residential Neighbourhoods of the Gaza Strip
19.01.2009
HCJ 201/09, 248/09 - Physicians for Human Rights et al. v. The Prime Minister et al. Judgment
14.01.2009
An Immediate Cessation of the Use of Illegal Weapons in Contravention of International Law
23.11.2008
The Jerusalem Magistrate Court ruled a NIS 75,000 compensation for three brothers represented by HaMoked for beating and abuse by Border Police officers in Hebron: In the incident, the officers brutally beat the three brothers – minors at the time – and pushed away their mother who came to their aid
28.10.2008
Exceptions: Prosecution of IDF soldiers during and after the Second Intifada, 2000-2007
07.07.2008
HaMoked – Center for the Defence of the Individual, The Association for Civil Rights in Israel and Adalah publish a position paper against the proposed Civil Wrongs (Liability of State) Law (Amendment No. 8) – 2008, which passed first reading in the Knesset. The proposed law is intended to prevent residents of the Territories from filing tort claims against the State even in cases in which damage was incurred irrespective of acts of war: The organizations caution that the proposed law is an attempt to revive the law unanimously struck down by nine justices of the Supreme Court for being uncons