המוקד להגנת הפרט
عر HE wheel chair icon
Updates
israeli law
international law
literature
all documents
Sort by: Newest
Newest
Oldest
results in page: 10
10
20
30
40
50
By date range
By date range
09.10.2017
New policy: after demolishing the assailants’ family homes, Israel now files lawsuits against the families
02.10.2017
HaMoked in a petition to the HCJ: Palestinians whose property was confiscated by the military in the past must be allowed to appeal against it to the special committee established in this matter upon the court’s instruction
01.10.2017
Appeals Tribunal rejects Im Tirtzu motion to join proceedings on revocation of status of an assailant’s relatives
28.09.2017
Following HaMoked’s petitions: after years of living with just stay permits and no social security rights, 1,573 Palestinians residing in the Israel in the framework of the family unification procedure receive temporary status
14.09.2017
Following HaMoked petition: the military disclosed previous procedures on the burial of Palestinians’ bodies it is holding
31.08.2017
HaMoked to appeals tribunal: Dismiss Im Tirtzu motion to join proceedings challenging status revocation for assailant's relatives
22.08.2017
HaMoked to the Attorney General: to punitively demolish a home without first making sure the objection rejection notice actually arrived is an outrage; using such a draconian authority requires strict adherence to the administrative proceeding, especially concerning exhaustion of the right to contest
20.08.2017
Updated summary on punitive home demolitions from July 2014 to August 20, 2017
17.08.2017
Following HaMoked’s petition against the military’s intention to complete a punitive demolition of a West Bank residential unit demolished a year earlier: the remaining parts of the targeted floor will be sealed rather than demolished, to prevent damage to the ground floor where the family lives
16.08.2017
Wrongfully and without proper notice: the military demolished tonight a family home in the West Bank, without bothering to respond to HaMoked’s objection in the matter