המוקד להגנת הפרט
Damage to Property
Damage to PropertyConfiscation of PropertyTheftHouse DemolitionsSeizure of HousesDamage to Infrastructure
Updates
israeli law
international law
literature
all documents
show by: oldest results in page: 10
10
20
30
40
50
by date range
by date range אם
08.03.2011
The Jerusalem Magistrates’ Court ordered the state to compensate a Palestinian for money stolen from his home during a military operation: the state appeals
24.02.2011
HaMoked: Center for the Defence of the Individual appeals to the Supreme Court: the state must compensate the owners of a five storey building, exploded during operation "Defensive Shield"
15.06.2009
Israeli human rights organizations to the EU: Use Association Council meeting to stop settlements and open Gaza
04.03.2009
HaMoked and B'Tselem petitioned the HCJ demanding to allow the entry of three B'Tselem workers into the Gaza Strip, in order to document and examine the humanitarian situation and the state of human rights following the fighting: the Court instructed the State to respond to the petition within 14 days
07.07.2008
HaMoked – Center for the Defence of the Individual, The Association for Civil Rights in Israel and Adalah publish a position paper against the proposed Civil Wrongs (Liability of State) Law (Amendment No. 8) – 2008, which passed first reading in the Knesset. The proposed law is intended to prevent residents of the Territories from filing tort claims against the State even in cases in which damage was incurred irrespective of acts of war: The organizations caution that the proposed law is an attempt to revive the law unanimously struck down by nine justices of the Supreme Court for being uncons
11.06.2008
Yesterday, Tuesday, 10 June 2008, the Civil Wrongs (Liability of State) Law (Amendment No. 8) – 2008 passed first reading in the Knesset.  The bill, promoted by Justice Minister Freidman, is designed to prevent residents of the Territories from filing tort claims against the state, even when damage was incurred in circumstances unrelated to acts of war: human rights organizations, including HaMoked, caution that the bill is an attempt to revive Amendment No. 7, which was unanimously struck down by 9 Supreme Court Justices after it was found to be unconstitutional
10.06.2008
Today, 10 June 2008, the Knesset will vote on the first reading of the Civil Wrongs (Liability of State) Law (Amendment No. 8) – 2008. The bill, promoted by Justice Minister Freedman is aimed at denying residents of the Territories the possibility to file compensation claims against the State even when the damage was incurred irrespective of wartime actions: human rights organizations, including HaMoked, caution that the bill is seeking to revive amendment no. 7 which was unanimously struck down by a panel of nine Supreme Court Justices after it was found to be unconstitutional
31.12.2007
HaMoked has filed a complaint with the Legal Advisor to the Security Establishment concerning serious suspicions against a private investigator sent on behalf of the Defense Ministry to undertake an overt investigation in the home of Palestinian residents of the village of `Arraba: Among other suspicions, the interrogator is suspected of violating his obligations under the regulations; making a false representation; forwarding untrue information to his interrogators; trespassing; injuring the complainants’ rights and their due contacts with their attorney and with HaMoked staff with whom they
21.10.2007
Under a settlement signed by the State and a Palestinian plaintiff who was represented by HaMoked, the State of Israel will pay 46,000 NIS in damages to the plaintiff: The plaintiff was brutally beaten by a settler, who also caused damage to the victim’s private car, while a soldier “guarding” nearby ignored his cry for help
09.09.2007
HaMoked - The Center for the Defence of the Individual opines in a position paper, that the memorandum of Amendment No. 8 to the Civil Torts Law (Liability of the State) is unconstitutional, violates basic principles of Israeli and international law, and should therefore be set aside: The proposed memorandum attempts to revive Amendment No. 7 which has been unanimously struck down as unconstitutional by a panel of nine Supreme Court justices.