המוקד להגנת הפרט
عر HE wheel chair icon
House Demolitions
Updates
israeli law
international law
literature
all documents
Sort by: Newest
Newest
Oldest
results in page: 10
10
20
30
40
50
By date range
By date range
15.12.2016
Easy to destroy, harder to rebuild: the military announced its plan to demolish anew a structure it had already punitively demolished in a negligent manner, on the grounds of illegal construction; HaMoked petitioned the HCJ
23.11.2016
Punitive demolition order threatens the home of an East Jerusalem resident and her five children; HaMoked: Home demolition constitutes collective punishment harming the innocent
21.11.2016
Updated summary on punitive home demolitions from July 2014 to November 21, 2016
09.11.2016
HaMoked to the military: Your insistence on leaving in uncertainty 95 Palestinian families whose homes were surveyed without a punitive demolition order is “confirmation that the current policy does indeed use Regulation 119 to inspire fear and exact revenge on the families
07.11.2016
HaMoked to the HCJ: the military’s decision to close a candy store on the grounds that it was a “a center of sedition” was unfair and based on extraneous considerations
02.11.2016
The HCJ approves the 20th demolition order in 2016: the justices determined that although the youth did not participate in the attack itself, he must “be regarded as someone who operated in the inner circle” and approved the sealing of his room
18.10.2016
HaMoked petitions yet again against a punitive demolition order: using Regulation 119 is unacceptable even if the HCJ avoids a principle discussion of the issue
10.10.2016
The military rejected an objection to a punitive demolition order: “the intent is to demolish the room adjacent to the parents’ house, in which the terrorist actually slept, and not the other rooms in the structure”
28.09.2016
Updated summary on punitive home demolitions from July 2014 to September 28, 2016
27.09.2016
The HCJ revokes one punitive demolition order and upholds another: Regulation 119 may be implemented against “indirect” culprits if their actions were crucial for the “realization of the attack”