Center for the Defence of the Individual - HaMoked responds to the State's position in its petition to have the IPS accurately record where detainees are being held. HaMoked clarifies a number of inaccuracies in the State's response: For example, the State refers to a procedure which does not reflect the facts described in the petition and claims it has done nothing wrong, that there are very few cases where detainees have not been registered and that these are a result of prison overload
العربية HE wheel chair icon
חזרה לעמוד הקודם
25.11.2007

HaMoked responds to the State's position in its petition to have the IPS accurately record where detainees are being held. HaMoked clarifies a number of inaccuracies in the State's response: For example, the State refers to a procedure which does not reflect the facts described in the petition and claims it has done nothing wrong, that there are very few cases where detainees have not been registered and that these are a result of prison overload

On 16 October, 2007, HaMoked – Center for the Defence of the Individual filed a Habeas Corpus petition to locate a detainee who had been held at Kishon prison and transferred to an unknown location. The prisoner was located following the filing of the petition, yet HaMoked requested the Court compel the State to address the relief sought on matters of principle and order it to record where prisoners in its custody are located in real time. The Court accepted HaMoked's request and on 5 November, the State Attorney's Office filed a response on behalf of the military and the Israel Prison Services (IPS). 
In their response, the Respondents quote the IPS Commissioner's Order which regulates the processing of detainees transferred from police custody to the IPS. In its response dated 6 November 2007, HaMoked clarified that all the detainees whose matters were raised before the Court had been transferred between IPS facilities, a fact which invalidates the legal basis on which the State rested its arguments.
Moreover, the State's response notes that a special team was set up for the purpose of examining the issue of detainee records in the various prisons. This is insufficient. HaMoked requested the Court order the State to submit a supplementary notice within 60 days, in which the Respondents would provide details on the examination's team, its conclusions and what actions were taken by the Respondents to apply them. 
To view HaMoked's response to the State's response dated 6 November 2007 (in Hebrew) 

Related topics